From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 30 23:59:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 189EDAE3592 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:59:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ig0-x232.google.com (mail-ig0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6F011CAC for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ig0-x232.google.com with SMTP id cl4so114861252igb.0 for ; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc; bh=5C+bzIA+7KM9xkqGFG3EJbnj3feJ8TznhIvgkPyAQi4=; b=koNXyQbYpPFqTLtXNm6uf8hmxsi6YcPy5KsY98FRTun199VLrju+k0lRuEuYaoSiAN 2S+Mc1E4/oZ6q0AtQnocBeAD7RTYfn/p4XaOitMOdw/sAHtVpuoImbr+/hcJcZd7ntJR ht1dS1T6DJhpec1Fwoc4AnorJ/q4iQdTirRH1bPFaXdMrWa92SsDgNoRqmyDB8Pg0ZHx kERueTV46DH0Z2a6BpcqC4+7DXvZNqAyKKwKqqcrrOu0hala/wi9EhrUoRwcn+dhife0 ty/RgY8OEKUEMl4Ml17W2GQJHMx0e3JM/DEFEYFbqFS9X9i+3v/qXkOXkgGpSpk4npkE qmWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=5C+bzIA+7KM9xkqGFG3EJbnj3feJ8TznhIvgkPyAQi4=; b=E0Mn/Ul4ChtxCRuc5Dhn85OIE3rAXUfHrsV0KfBSDN8AU8bnfjYuXWEvrvrehZUq+/ sxta+JQcecRoEczzkxTkfuOh6qdQBLiqBpBO7GkfllhMQxKTMypRNqd2M3SG6i3kWrLR VFd2yzKloUs6lA0fNJdbLZcsuZseAyABdKTvXpRcqyw2Q0ItdH9P32ItlVB/Hb9hLczs 5RTBATU9noOliLItdsrt4LvAoK1gK80DN3Nr9HFgezqUtphNiRfxzJk8+MQcA7/L9DkI DNdvghou4Pz3v8jSrvCezghVbAz6LxaTBaR0tV4TK0BDb97Q1l+5y7jHZZi6gK3SA4lG jBvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIlAXSCyxRqcFTSZzF2tvv7vuOYW8wBUoWDleKbNPaccw/Es4jvz1UjrfP3prV+P0He+SDjuxO/Q5ZEcQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.142.37 with SMTP id rt5mr25999420igb.15.1459382347402; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.35.31 with HTTP; Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 16:59:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jRXSf0ERDuaeDq2SoXiRbhQRjTw Message-ID: Subject: Re: Multiple ffmpeg versions in ports From: Kevin Oberman To: Ben Woods Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 23:59:08 -0000 On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Ben Woods wrote: > On 30 March 2016 at 23:28, Ben Woods wrote: > > > > > What do you think about having numerous versions of ffmpeg in ports, > > similar to lang/python? > > > > > I guess the obvious question is how could it be possible for multiple > ffmpeg versions to be installed at the same time? Is it possible to ensure > the files do not overlap, and that each package is linking against the > correct installed version? > > -- > From: Benjamin Woods > woodsb02@gmail.com > Probably speaking out of turn, but we do have ffmpeg0 and ffmpeg in ports now. For quite some time we had ffmpeg1, as well, but I think all ports have now moved on, so ffmpeg1 was removed. It would be up to someone to write he support for a separate ffmpeg3/ -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683