From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 24 06:10:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D13159 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:10:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x233.google.com (mail-vb0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::233]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD965308 for ; Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:10:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fq11so3425230vbb.10 for ; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:10:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xrxSUtMfJgLa7SABJqD6ezA5vAFGaEHhuOjHhPKboFE=; b=D4CDw4iKJzPrjtrKgNBKlrfF6c+dV3Oq9WfPVhf/RPnIwWaa14R46DO+cP+g4P65m3 ukKcx6k5e9YncZ0IALPcql8/b4fESJjlPCrih3yu/PlXUIi3iRlosZNvZM4mzq7ZBhAi +qQs6QGiy6O57pGHDJUJHr3T0yr+ok14D9XAlYLaAB15BlIAHHhXP7YD6ngCVExJ9tsp Y8vJ3M4GnZF2tmlRLMWFqZ4uotVqbizgEuLqju3kYAjAyYNM9C0bT/8p+W5x1ntSCJb7 LymwV4ltx2Jj5jH/tnsTfjJhi0VXe5XPi6d/qSAZudlbRAzo3qw4PeY7CE2eelHlRu4O gVRA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.40.9 with SMTP id i9mr9951239vce.23.1364105402864; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:10:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.132.203 with HTTP; Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:10:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <142597a8659b43db8665aa1f055d2ff1@sys.tomatointeractive.it> References: <514C1E5F.8040504@contactlab.com> <142597a8659b43db8665aa1f055d2ff1@sys.tomatointeractive.it> Date: Sat, 23 Mar 2013 23:10:02 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.1 vs CentOS 6.3 From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: davide.damico@contactlab.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Mar 2013 06:10:04 -0000 On Sat, Mar 23, 2013 at 10:59 PM, Davide D'Amico < davide.damico@contactlab.com> wrote: > Il 22.03.2013 16:56 =D0=95=D0=B2=D0=B3=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B9 =D0=A5=D0= =BE=D1=80=D0=BA=D0=B8=D0=BD ha scritto: > >> Hi Davide! >> > > Sorry if I do a reply 'here' but some posts where filtered by antispam. > > To Daniel Bilik: yes, I used the 'complex' OLTP tests, because more > similar to my production dataset/workload. > > I'll try the 'simple' dataset, but do you think I have some chance to > "solve" the issue? > > Thanks, > d. > > Since you are testing CentOS , is there a difference between Fedora and CentOS ? If you tried this alternative or your idea about difference if you did not try it . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk