From owner-freebsd-wireless@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 5 20:40:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8605B3BA for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x232.google.com (mail-qa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 411461B5E for ; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 20:40:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id cm18so11809310qab.9 for ; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DlCH5hXBUSPb9yiri0ZeN3SzJ/9Y0xnV8N4FDZuxxqQ=; b=smqw03zWY72sV2/RhmN0U6hXARLFBmb/9Me53zV/IzW9uBOQIK/w+GFNwK40WK0DZ4 xOWv1gh9o+DUounNc4NR+QG4dde8Je44UvQX1ByTMPL1x5t7kg0j6kHGies69mYGpZyJ UMwwzBqR8OVbreEgojp2LAwq4wHeSB5nrKqyadD/ZgtWHkhMv3RNhPGr5/mg0T/kS/uY kZhpYqS48Q+ww3ElivYzy1QJs6DpKw/5OA/CdlHR6B1+DGabONZhXX+or7W3li9RY1rf zanLfpEcm/76TQDffpam40TttAJzAnxlIRBADLFyZmLJ7Plty0wvYYxDCOcr962kHZ06 oxDA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.36.4 with SMTP id r4mr22021926qad.69.1409949654379; Fri, 05 Sep 2014 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.39.139 with HTTP; Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:40:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 5 Sep 2014 13:40:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jdFOsolrv-VpcxrFLjMiqAdqfH8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 status From: Adrian Chadd To: Oliver Pinter Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussions of 802.11 stack, tools device driver development." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2014 20:40:55 -0000 Also, do you run this with -bgscan ? -a On 5 September 2014 12:26, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi! > > This is just an iwn panic. Did your actual -HEAD kernel panic? > > Try doing this with sysctl dev.iwn.0.debug=0xff; let's see what > happens just before the firmware loses its mind. > > Thanks! > > > -a > > > On 5 September 2014 12:22, Oliver Pinter wrote: >> I got the attached iwn panic, even if running in -ht mode. In between >> I have a working connection. >> I set up now a serial console and try to enable the ht mode with debugging. >> >> On 9/3/14, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>> Or not, I forgot the -ht option in rc.conf. >>> >>> G STA + G AP = ok >>> G STA + N AP = ok >>> N STA + N AP = fail >>> >>> On 9/3/14, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>> Hi! >>>> >>>> Small status update: >>>> The mode N works too, I mistyped the other AP's passwork. >>>> So both mode G and mode N working after the backports. >>>> >>>> BTW, can you MFC the same changes to 10.1? >>>> >>>> On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> Compile it with IWN_DEBUG, then >>>>> >>>>> sysctl dev.iwn.0.debug=0x1 >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -a >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 2 September 2014 12:41, Oliver Pinter wrote: >>>>>> I not tried freebsd-head yet, but I'm able today. In mode N seems like >>>>>> the NIC sends only one frame, and no more. >>>>>> >>>>>> With tcpdump and/or wlandebug I see only rx packets and no tx. >>>>>> >>>>>> If you add some pointer what changes must I create to easier debug, or >>>>>> what concrete information required, feel free to ping me or send the >>>>>> details. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/2/14, Adrian Chadd wrote: >>>>>>> Cool! Have you tried freebsd-head? Does it work there? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> How's it failing in association state? What's it saying? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -a >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 2 September 2014 12:30, Oliver Pinter >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi All! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> After I backported all of the net80211 and iwn changes from >>>>>>>> 11-CURRENT >>>>>>>> to 10-STABLE the wireless NIC in subject working on mode G. If I try >>>>>>>> to use with mode N (ht20, ht40) it failed in association state. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> All of the backports are in this github repo: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> https://github.com/opntr/opBSD/commits/op/stable/10-iwn-backport >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Oliver >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>