From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 15 22:21:13 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161D216A409; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056CA13C4B8; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:21:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5E61A3C1A; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 14:21:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E8B2524AA; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:21:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 17:21:11 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Alex Dupre Message-ID: <20070215222111.GA45309@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200702141652.l1EGqeZV047261@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070215095351.GA34667@FreeBSD.org> <45D4337A.8080302@FreeBSD.org> <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org> <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/Subversive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:21:13 -0000 On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:54:49PM +0100, Alex Dupre wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Ideally, yes. But we can start by not adding new ones :) > > Of course, but those ports are misleading. I'd never committed a port > with the first letter upper-case if there weren't already others 0:-) > Said so, should the PORTNAME be modified as well or is the port > directory enough? Why not read what the porter's handbook has to say? ;-) Kris