Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 19:58:56 -0400 From: Albert Vest <alvest@earthlink.net> To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE Message-ID: <20060718195856.8f1ebc9d.alvest@earthlink.net> In-Reply-To: <86mzb6d7gl.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <200607130024.18047.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <44B740A5.6050709@FreeBSD.org> <200607141300.43547.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <86mzb6d7gl.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 18 Jul 2006 21:43:54 +0200 des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) wrote: > Dejan Lesjak <dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> writes: > > [...] as far as X.org 7 ports themselves go, they right now already > > happily build and install under /usr/X11R6 prefix [...] >=20 > This makes no sense at all, since X.org is (by definition) X11R7. I was wondering when someone would mention that (6 -> 7). Forgive a newbie= question, but was there a similar discussion when the X11R5 -> X11R6 chang= e was in the works? Why did it resolve the way it did? Thanks, --=20 Albert Vest, al vest at earth link dot net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060718195856.8f1ebc9d.alvest>