From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 17 23:23:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF4241E for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpet@sdf.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (mx.sdf.org [192.94.73.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A988AF for ; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:23:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (dsl-187-150-179-163-dyn.prod-infinitum.com.mx [187.150.179.163] (may be forged)) (authenticated (0 bits)) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r2HNNJrq023905; Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:23:20 GMT Message-ID: <51465066.3070704@sdf.org> Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 17:23:18 -0600 From: Chris Petrik User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130308 Thunderbird/17.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Waitman Gobble Subject: Re: Gnustep group References: <1363562500.51540@da3m0n8t3r.com> In-Reply-To: <1363562500.51540@da3m0n8t3r.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John Marino , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2013 23:23:24 -0000 On 03/17/2013 05:21 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: > Chris Petrik wrote .. >> On 03/17/2013 04:23 PM, Waitman Gobble wrote: >>> John Marino wrote .. >>>> On 3/17/2013 22:58, Chris Petrik wrote: >>>>>> Yes, after review I notice the GNUstep ports are totally not working.. >>>>>> it doesn't work with base clang. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, clang in ports works, and all the GNUstep modules build from >>>>>> svn without issue.. so it really should be a piece of cake to build >>>>>> some new GNUstep ports.. if there's interest. >>>>>> Here are my notes so far. >>>>>> >>>> FWIW - All the GNUstep ports build fine in DPorts (ports on DragonFly). >>>> However, the compiler uses is the base compiler, which is GCC 4.7 with >>>> ObjC built-in. >>>> >>>> That would imply setting USE_GCC=4.6+ would "fix" gnustep on ports, no? >>>> >>>> John >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> Maybe it will work, I tried with gcc48. One of the gnustep ports is stuck on >> trying to build gcc4.2 for some reason.. I don't recall which one at the moment, >> i think it was base? >> I would try the next minimum build which is 4.4 if that works then add >> in 4.4+ etc.. but i havent messed with it yet. > > Yes, this should work. BUT why the heck would one of the GNUstep ports stubbornly demand to try to install gcc 4.2 from ports? Something to check out. > > GNUstep src from svn builds without any troubles, so it should be very easy to set up some new ports IMHO. The GNUstep apps build OK too, it's just a matter of setting the variable GNUSTEP_MAKEFILES to point to the Makefiles. > > Here's a screen shot of GORM running on my FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT machine w/ XFCE4 desktop. > > https://dx.burplex.com/ui/gorm-sreenshot.png > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I would be using the latest released ver not svn.