Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2021 11:18:27 -0500 (EST) From: Doug Denault <doug@safeport.com> To: Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: iocage question Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.2112091113380.87287@bucksport.safeport.com> In-Reply-To: <CACNAnaGRDtugdqyDKtwFwTcyQn=6d7YVrFsr6Y-7XUvDeBV%2Bjw@mail.gmail.com> References: <524fc989-b859-6e1-3c30-52e7bd1c892c@safeport.com> <CACNAnaE5EVcDHV1TdeGtfM52RM3w1Q9Cc7dxApC_6hOS8_F68w@mail.gmail.com> <CACNAnaGRDtugdqyDKtwFwTcyQn=6d7YVrFsr6Y-7XUvDeBV%2Bjw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 9 Dec 2021, Kyle Evans wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:32 AM Kyle Evans <kevans@freebsd.org> wrote: >> >> On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 12:20 AM doug <doug@safeport.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm running FreeBSD 12.2-RELEASE-p11, and py38-iocage-1.2_9. All the 12.2 >>> jails give the following error starting inetd: >>> inetd[nnnnn]: madvise() failed: Operation not permitted >>> >> >> Right, this is expected and should be non-fatal. Jailed processes >> can't use MADV_PROTECT (prevent out-of-swap kills) under default >> policy and there is no allow flag for it. We could maybe improve it to >> check if we're jailed and not complain about the error when it >> happens, though. >> > > "... check if we're jailed ..." could be spelled as "... check if we > received an EPERM ..." > Re MADV_PROTECT, thanks makes perfect sense. I wasn't able to find any info via archives and google. About "check if ..." I assume that is meant for contributors. If not, nothing like either appears in any log. _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.2112091113380.87287>