From owner-freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 07:04:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5484106566B; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:04:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ariane@stack.nl) Received: from mx1.stack.nl (relay02.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F628FC08; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:04:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from turtle.stack.nl (turtle.stack.nl [IPv6:2001:610:1108:5010::132]) by mx1.stack.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE51535BF71; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:04:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by turtle.stack.nl (Postfix, from userid 1711) id A4B2217541; Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:04:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 08:04:58 +0100 From: Ariane van der Steldt To: Nathan Whitehorn Message-ID: <20120114070458.GA67086@stack.nl> References: <201201140116.q0E1Gj7E055563@freefall.freebsd.org> <4F10DF18.9020703@freebsd.org> <20120114064224.GA66588@stack.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120114064224.GA66588@stack.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org, eadler@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sysinstall@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/164094: bsdinstall(8): installer progress over 100% X-BeenThere: freebsd-sysinstall@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Sysinstall Work List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2012 07:05:00 -0000 On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 07:42:24AM +0100, Ariane van der Steldt wrote: > Hi Nathan, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 07:49:12PM -0600, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > On 01/13/12 19:16, eadler@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > > Old Synopsis: installer progress over 100% New Synopsis: > > > bsdinstall(8): installer progress over 100% > > First of all my apologies for providing the wrong synopsis and most > likely leading to some confusion (I know I was confused). Upon closer examination, the body of this e-mail suggests that you want info on PR 164097, but the subject suggests PR 164094. I replied with info for the former, please inform me if you really wanted info on PR 164094 instead. I'm slightly confused right now :) -- Ariane