From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Wed Feb 15 21:02:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB55CE089D for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AC60135E for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:02:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id c7so2310889itd.1 for ; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:02:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=lBHe6/pz5fBNRXtZmjXFmQCTjeek//STCGQYzWHVJ5Q=; b=uAOSxottnmDBk9yUDEUYeQF5lWsZPfBVnAwVJitorg/xn9oYZBAjzwBQWqGHEWUTEx u5eSDv7Xat4UyOhnSmNVv9Zxjw7J4jW+yDmcoDdhPsB1/APNfGdDm7FYf+tL8RPD2hc/ bRkFUPcqX6R0TnU27xHtGd7L4XzaQEAXJr3MImeTLtpEUsRU+KdeexMCznj6COgXiHrT 91UnT5fGQUp18v55SFDaZPIEtBlV2KYbXhhekmzCwSSKBinYrcjRgBsArGIyJP1PZr1S 5+y6AUUZHcyY9Q7pPYn68g0UP6bBxWSl/iBwPPrTQnBxrFzeVLmgGGRuPN38EDS6u8Wp y/ZQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=lBHe6/pz5fBNRXtZmjXFmQCTjeek//STCGQYzWHVJ5Q=; b=mJRxTXJ/euxA86IARhlFl7ngwCls3EEW2XLxUkCvzl3h3s7v55QcCY432fjAHI+9Kf gTTRnmF7qRQTK99gGkosINuG+4KBBltdxebhchLGLTtZQtjgyQahdictWVHY8DPK0cuq GjPlFMXHShgP633QpLNe/g1OfMD+/lIuK7xwU9kdOiyh6NIPVaRwplFirbNuT3BE9NKL 4ctpX9NkQm2yhxqNNu8ciRb77fcO7PVk4F3VE1VavY+MzKtoeUCUIdlp+EbGdgoUuyGK 0SSY4cJw4xPaWCNp1LUAJJT4EAPM2/FJbY82SaHJzM7DxOM5dn9PnN8jNSQiv3/oU/Z3 Sl/A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kynonP5rKkVyxuoVq4H5IB93Jp3cswIEITVznzcCcpbOmZ48JAue6jZfF0UpLLeaCY1DP2WW0vSIfRZg== X-Received: by 10.36.116.71 with SMTP id o68mr11813276itc.60.1487192551533; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:02:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 10.79.145.217 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Feb 2017 13:02:30 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.53.245.200] In-Reply-To: References: From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 14:02:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: EmBZWkBV_ALILfv2w38XnbqbH5g Message-ID: Subject: Re: removing SVR4 binary compatibilty layer To: Mark Millard Cc: Gleb Smirnoff , FreeBSD-STABLE Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2017 21:02:32 -0000 On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 1:46 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > Gleb Smirnoff glebius at FreeBSD.org wrote > on Tue Feb 14 18:32:40 UTC 2017 : > >> After some discussion on svn mailing list [1], there is intention >> to remove SVR4 binary compatibilty layer from FreeBSD head, meaning >> that FreeBSD 12.0-RELEASE, available in couple of years would >> be shipped without it. There is no intention of merge of the removal. >> The stable@ mailing list added for wider audience. > > Can we presume no invalidation of the TARGET_ARCH=powerpc ABI? > It is SVR4 based as I remember (unlike TARGET_ARCH=powerpc64 ). This is just the SVR4 image activation. The ABI stuff that you are talking about is different. It won't affect that. Warner