From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 24 20:17:52 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C762416A4CE for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7622943D1F for ; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:17:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1P4GqDL064734; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:16:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i1P4GpqH064731; Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:16:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 23:16:51 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: ravi pina In-Reply-To: <20040223204736.GB69611@happy.cow.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Possible corrupt disklabel and more X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 04:17:52 -0000 On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, ravi pina wrote: > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 10:30:44PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov said at one point in time: > > On Mon, 23 Feb 2004, 14:21-0500, Jim Rees wrote: > > > > > I've often wished I had a tool that searches a raw disk for superblocks then > > > suggests a possible disklabel. Surely someone has already written this? > > > > Sure. We have one in our src tree: src/tools/tools/find-sb. > > which version? i didn't see it in my 4.8 tree. If you're running 4.x, try: http://www.watson.org/~robert/freebsd/scan_ffs_freebsd4/ That's a port of the OpenBSD tool. There was a version adapted for UFS2 floating around somewhere also, but if you're running 4.x that's not an issue. It has a mode that spits out the disklabel -- make sure to run it on the disk slice so you get offsets relative to the slice. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research