Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Apr 2009 11:14:55 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Frederique Rijsdijk <frederique@isafeelin.org>
Cc:        Seur Bors <seurbors@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD as a Business Server
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.0904041114130.70727@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <49D719A4.8040101@isafeelin.org>
References:  <26b281ee0904031042g754096d1k13d016b88d653cb8@mail.gmail.com> <49D719A4.8040101@isafeelin.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>
> Samba3 performs excellend nowadays. You should have no trouble at all serving 
> 20 workers. In my setup (7.1-release/amd64/dual x2 3800 amd cpu/gigabit) smb 
> generates only 3-5% cpu load when reading at 50MB/sec.


below 10% CPU when reading 8MB/s through fast ethernet link on 
PIII/500

>
> I would also recommend running swat (zee /etc/inetd.conf), it can really help 
> creating a nice and tailored smb.conf file for you via a webinterface.

i would rather recommend

man smb.conf




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.0904041114130.70727>