From owner-freebsd-isp  Sun Jun 27  9:55:49 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org
Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [158.36.41.162])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 856D014C23
	for <FreeBSD-isp@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 27 Jun 1999 09:55:46 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from sthaug@nethelp.no)
Received: (qmail 45004 invoked by uid 1001); 27 Jun 1999 16:55:45 +0000 (GMT)
To: dennis@etinc.com
Cc: chuckr@picnic.mat.net, FreeBSD-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: sendmail relaying
From: sthaug@nethelp.no
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 28 Jun 1999 00:19:26 -0400"
References: <199906271607.MAA11118@etinc.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 1999 18:55:44 +0200
Message-ID: <45002.930502544@verdi.nethelp.no>
Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

> I don't *know* it was a college student...I was just saying that a lot of
> the people that companies have administering their servers/routers dont
> know much about the business implications of doing something that they
> think is "cool".

The people who run ORBS/IMRSS are definitely not college students. They
are very much aware of what they are doing.

Note that it's the individual email administrator who needs to actively
choose to use ORBS/IMRSS. It's not forced upon you.

PS: No, I'm not a neutral observer. I help to run slave name servers for
RBL, DUL (nn.uninett.no), IMRSS and ORBS (snipp.uninett.no). I'm happy
to see that these databases are having an effect in actually getting
open relays and spam systems closed.

Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message