From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 26 19:45:37 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E4616A41F for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 19:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.228]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22ECF13C458 for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 19:45:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kabaev@gmail.com) Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id h28so770726wxd for ; Sat, 26 May 2007 12:45:36 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=DzSWdDD2Z0OkDUKK3pqRXXxpTOWPKw3ntUCF1C3TxFLX9LLOe1MtW5+o6wqv8HFyMDjP3Z2SdTGU4ipOXoK9t3VO3iw/SSVlJZhPvLoHGr8auUyIiXnxTGxWTB0WpF/IJbGNgLZ7U3t9zgX5K6W3NIlWOHRC5DewcEmY2HJvqJg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version:content-type; b=mpjjvA/E4s/zOWBMLRZveXcbh0+7RsWba5CkEf+IzZAMkW5Gghe0IUm76EAfMazYQJDkKMsSUJiTjqC3AKnr01mzyrvSTWtgJoFnseCXY4KPjrkgzi8asI3dYmOfoisfXL1VWQcC2CFQM4Sw78KNcl80GqxhImKWjpl+MGjuPC4= Received: by 10.70.65.8 with SMTP id n8mr5994487wxa.1180208736564; Sat, 26 May 2007 12:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kan.dnsalias.net ( [24.34.98.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTP id 32sm5209004wri.2007.05.26.12.45.35; Sat, 26 May 2007 12:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 15:45:31 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: "Yuriy Tsibizov" Message-ID: <20070526154531.79503c6b@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <009301c79fcd$e3040060$1e00000a@hhp.local> References: <009301c79fcd$e3040060$1e00000a@hhp.local> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.8.1 (GTK+ 2.10.11; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_jgJ=e6rMr_iLOXq6VxwisHQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd@unixfreunde.de, ed@fxq.nl, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Regression] snd_emu10k1 doesn't work after GCC 4.2 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 May 2007 19:45:37 -0000 --Sig_jgJ=e6rMr_iLOXq6VxwisHQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 26 May 2007 23:38:58 +0400 "Yuriy Tsibizov" wrote: > Alexander, I'm working on it. > The only thing I can say right now, that it's -ftree-vrp that broke > the code -- building with -O -ftree-vrp makes broken binary, while -O > alone does not.=20 >=20 > (sorry for top-posting) Thanks. Ideally should be able to distill the case info a simple preprocessed .i file with just enough code to demonstrate the mis-compilation. I do not have any of the snd_emuXXX cards here myself. --=20 Alexander Kabaev --Sig_jgJ=e6rMr_iLOXq6VxwisHQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFGWI5bQ6z1jMm+XZYRAmCcAJwK9V+N+PJ4M+i0FUsagA+1ArYwMwCfUKFl ViQCYz9Y5xNy15VXggPbo5M= =lhfQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_jgJ=e6rMr_iLOXq6VxwisHQ--