Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 9 Apr 1998 03:25:18 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Jerry Blancher <flerll@kaschynna.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Kingston KNE30T PCI
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980409025649.15723A-100000@kaschynna.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hello,
  I have the Kingston KNE30T PCI ethernet card. It is set up on a new
system with NO load and NO traffic. Here is a clipping of my system:

CPU: AMD-K6tm w/ multimedia extensions (233.86-MHz 586-class CPU)
  Origin = "AuthenticAMD"  Id = 0x562  Stepping=2
  Features=0x8001bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8,MMX>
real memory  = 67108864 (65536K bytes)
avail memory = 61206528 (59772K bytes)
Probing for devices on PCI bus 0:
chip0 <generic PCI bridge (vendor=1106 device=1595 subclass=0)> rev 3 on
pci0:0:
0
chip1 <generic PCI bridge (vendor=1106 device=0586 subclass=1)> rev 39 on
pci0:7
:0
pci0:7:1: VIA Technologies, device=0x0571, class=storage (ide) [no driver
assign
ed]
ed1 <NE2000 PCI Ethernet (RealTek 8029)> rev 0 int a irq 11 on pci0:11:0
ed1: address 00:c0:f0:2a:7c:29, type NE2000 (16 bit) 
Probing for PnP devices:
No Plug-n-Play devices were found.

 My first question is, why is it listing it as a (16 bit) card?

 My second question is why is it so slow to the first stop (router)
outside of my box..   traceroute:

 1  badboy.ieway.com (204.188.52.1)  1.991 ms  2.094 ms  2.094 ms

This new system is also on a new provider.

My old system on the old provider with a true 16 bit card running 2.2.5
(compared to 2.2.6 of the new system) pulls traceroutes to te first router
at times of less then .5 ms

When the old system and the new system was on the same hub, I could pull
files from the old system to the new system at the rate of over 1MB/sec.

 According to the Kingston manual, 
  PCI transfer up to 132 MB/sec
 EISA transfer up to  33 MB/sec
  ISA transfer up to   8 MB/sec

Now granted, #1 those are high to make them look better, #2 those reflect
BEST case situations and #3 The file downloaded was binary which would be
slower.

So, my major question is, is it the card, settings, or new provider that
would be slowing down the works?
 Also, is there a way to do a flood test on the ethernet card to see how
well it handles it's self? 

 BTW, GREAT job on 2.2.6, had no problems getting the OS to run, and I see
a few nasty bugs are fixed, mainly the : anyuser can freeze up the machine
with a simple kill command :). Also, I have run many other test's, trying
to break the OS (mainly scripts that run commands and also spawn other
process's that do the same) and the OS ends up freezing the scripts before
the system freezes up. As far as a server goes, FreeBSD seems to be VERY
stable, as most questions on this list are focasing on home or at least
user-at-console use.

Bravo FreeBSD!
  Jerry Blancher

_______________________________________________________________________
Kaschynna Communications                    mailto:flerll@kaschynna.com
Internet Presence Provider               mailto:flerll@drachenforge.com
Coeur d'Alene, Idaho                      208.765.9312     208.769.7337
Interactive MU* Hosting                   http://kaschynna.com/mudhost/
Drachen Forge MUD-telnet drachenforge.com 8000-http://drachenforge.com/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980409025649.15723A-100000>