From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 5 21:02:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E037616A41A for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 21:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.207.252]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89DFD13C45A for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2007 21:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 95414 invoked by uid 60001); 5 Oct 2007 20:35:47 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID; b=OZ8W6dGTWjy4qFLjBZ6iZR0VzujOLa/BUk0y/WLa+6mnVkxcwoktkHe09WQ09dNVTYwFFbpfmaB50mpUOFpAGF86rc2Vrcksiug5GhJpZ2Erc4wNpVKKY16HN9i89PoZAKSPxLRQ5QILKtd8H6nOmHg/0pCP6nHok/Dz127cx6s=; X-YMail-OSG: XZ8DYFEVM1k6ZCX3L7EkYOknH_duwkkqnKmn1nqDMF5xTux_Zf0zZ506cfE4E2lcC1aYHhaNXIVkASsykBW2zsWX4wgMVAUenhsaKdYZd.iVnUD8E_0JnNBwXUyKhQ-- Received: from [200.118.65.183] by web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:35:46 CDT Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT) From: To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: <980821.94716.qm@web32708.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 22:00:56 +0000 Subject: Re: viral license free fork of freebsd X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Oct 2007 21:02:29 -0000 While this topic comes up (again), it is my duty to remind you guys that the most serious viral license trojan in the tree is GNU readline, which being a library is under the GPL. More insight into the evilness of this is given by the FSF themselves: http://www.gnu.org/licenses/why-not-lgpl.html I understand vinum used to depend on GNU readline, but that is probably not the case anymore. Of course. if it's really that necessary we *should* be using NetBSD's libedit compatibility. ____________________________________________________________________________________ ¡Sé un mejor fotógrafo! Perfecciona tu técnica y encuentra las mejores fotos. http://telemundo.yahoo.com/promos/mejorfotografo.html