From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Wed Nov 20 23:20:17 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAA71C5244 for ; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:20:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (www.zefox.net [50.1.20.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "www.zefox.org", Issuer "www.zefox.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47JJZT1G0fz4VnV; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:20:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: from www.zefox.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id xAKNKHIu001439 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:20:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd@www.zefox.net) Received: (from fbsd@localhost) by www.zefox.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id xAKNKHNH001438; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:20:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fbsd) Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:20:17 -0800 From: bob prohaska To: Kyle Evans Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: g_vfs_done():ufs/rootfs[WRITE flood on rpi3 Message-ID: <20191120232017.GC1208@www.zefox.net> References: <20191120223703.GA1208@www.zefox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 47JJZT1G0fz4VnV X-Spamd-Bar: ----- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-5.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.995,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.994,0]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:20:17 -0000 On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 04:41:46PM -0600, Kyle Evans wrote: > > The revisions noted are a good data point, thanks! Can you try > upgrading the kernel past r354875 before I revert the most likely > candidate up to that point? Perhaps with this patch applied, to make > sure you're not hitting an interrupt race that's hard to deduce from > logs: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22430.diff > The r354909 kernel is running now, doing a test compile of www/chromium. so far no problems are apparent. > More than willing to build a kernel as described and put up for you to > download, as well, if you'd accept that. > If I understand correctly there's no need, if I'm mistaken please let me know. Thanks for your attention! bob prohaska > Thanks, > > Kyle Evans