Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Sep 2016 11:41:21 +0200
From:      Tijl Coosemans <tijl@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: linux_base-c6 (....) on amd64 without x86_64 support
Message-ID:  <20160920114121.2a416cad@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160920083411.GA2770@c720-r292778-amd64>
References:  <20160919105017.GB3529@c720-r292778-amd64> <20160919135119.48b5587b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20160920083411.GA2770@c720-r292778-amd64>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 20 Sep 2016 10:34:11 +0200 Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wrote:
> El d=C3=ADa Monday, September 19, 2016 a las 01:51:19PM +0200, Tijl Coose=
mans escribi=C3=B3:
>> On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 12:50:17 +0200 Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> wro=
te: =20
>>> I have compiled my ports with poudriere on amd64, based on ports r414411
>>> at the moment, and learned that the linux*c6 packages does not have
>>> x86_64 support; I recompiled as test emulators/linux_base-c6 and only if
>>> I set in /etc/make.conf:
>>>=20
>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=3Dc6_64
>>>=20
>>> the package is built as linux_base-c6_64-6.7_1.txz and has 64-bit
>>> support (and 32-bit too). Why do I have to set this extra variable
>>> OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT? =20
>>=20
>> Because it is new and experimental.  I plan to enable it by default in
>> January 2017, after FreeBSD 9, 10.1 and 10.2 EoL. =20
>=20
> I have checked out head of ports, but it is unwilling to build it on:
>=20
> # uname -a
> FreeBSD c720-r292778-amd64 11.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT #0
> r292778: Mon Dec 28 05:45:37 CET 2015
> root@poudriere-amd64:/usr/local/r292778/obj/usr/local/r292778/src/sys/GEN=
ERIC
> amd64

You need at least r297602, so try a more recent 11-stable or 12-current.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160920114121.2a416cad>