Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 17 Jun 2004 09:01:21 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Ilmar S. Habibulin" <ilmar@watson.org>
To:        Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: IT! WORKS!
Message-ID:  <20040617081225.H28897@fledge.watson.org>
In-Reply-To: <40D023EE.7020302@freebsd.org>
References:  <40CFC0A0.1000604@mWare.ca> <20040616034055.GE26532@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> <40CFC2CF.8080509@mWare.ca> <20040616085518.GA8881@kt-is.co.kr> <40D011A8.1030404@freebsd.org> <20040616102504.GB8881@kt-is.co.kr> <40D023EE.7020302@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Scott Long wrote:

> It would be very intereting to get some testing results from a blade100
> and an Ultra5/10 on this.  If people with this hardware can test and
> report back both whether it helps/hurts and if it had any impact on CPU
> load, I'll commit it.
I want to confirm type speed up on blade100 with this patch applied.
Can't tell top values now because of some bug, which causes kernel panic.
So i have unbootable blade now. :(
This bug is not related to the patch. I think i've reported it once. If
you use screen as console and log in via ssh, kernel panics after some
period of time. Don't know how to trace this panics, should i make the
same steps like on i386 - set dumdev, use dump, kernel.debug and gdb -k?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040617081225.H28897>