From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Jul 29 04:53:13 1995
Return-Path: ports-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id EAA11827
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 04:53:13 -0700
Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA11821
          for <ports@freebsd.org>; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 04:53:12 -0700
Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id EAA02399; Sat, 29 Jul 1995 04:53:03 -0700
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 1995 04:53:03 -0700
Message-Id: <199507291153.EAA02399@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU>
To: kelly@fsl.noaa.gov
CC: msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au, ports@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <9507281236.AA14352@emu.fsl.noaa.gov> (kelly@fsl.noaa.gov)
Subject: Re: Tcl 7.4 / Tk 4.0 Ports
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

 * No, it's not.  Ousterhout himself announced release-versions of tcl7.4
 * and tk4.0 on 1 July 95.

Ok, so now it's "release", but is it still incompatible?

Satoshi