From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 15 22:21:32 2007
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C8916A407
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:21:32 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from lab.alexdupre.com (lab.alexdupre.com [81.174.31.42])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B3C913C4B3
	for <cvs-all@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:21:31 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ale@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (qmail 87038 invoked from network); 15 Feb 2007 21:54:50 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.178.2?) (192.168.178.2)
	by lab.alexdupre.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2007 21:54:50 -0000
Message-ID: <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:54:49 +0100
From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.9 (X11/20070119)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
References: <200702141652.l1EGqeZV047261@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<20070215095351.GA34667@FreeBSD.org> <45D4337A.8080302@FreeBSD.org>
	<20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/Subversive Makefile
 distinfo pkg-descr
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:21:32 -0000

Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Ideally, yes.  But we can start by not adding new ones :)

Of course, but those ports are misleading. I'd never committed a port
with the first letter upper-case if there weren't already others 0:-)
Said so, should the PORTNAME be modified as well or is the port
directory enough?

--
Alex Dupre