Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 22:54:49 +0100 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel Makefile ports/devel/Subversive Makefile distinfo pkg-descr Message-ID: <45D4D6A9.4060600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200702141652.l1EGqeZV047261@repoman.freebsd.org> <20070215095351.GA34667@FreeBSD.org> <45D4337A.8080302@FreeBSD.org> <20070215185941.GA42443@xor.obsecurity.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kris Kennaway wrote: > Ideally, yes. But we can start by not adding new ones :) Of course, but those ports are misleading. I'd never committed a port with the first letter upper-case if there weren't already others 0:-) Said so, should the PORTNAME be modified as well or is the port directory enough? -- Alex Dupre
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?45D4D6A9.4060600>