From owner-freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 26 03:34:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 923CB16A4CF; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:34:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD37243D1D; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 03:34:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i2QBY8EY001980; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:34:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Pawel Jakub Dawidek From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:32:51 +0100." <20040326113251.GE8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 12:34:08 +0100 Message-ID: <1979.1080300848@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: geom@FreeBSD.org cc: Lukas Ertl Subject: Re: Problem with g_unload_class() X-BeenThere: freebsd-geom@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GEOM-specific discussions and implementations List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 11:34:10 -0000 In message <20040326113251.GE8930@darkness.comp.waw.pl>, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wr ites: > >+> We may need to move to a "can?/commit!" like two-phase protocol. >+> (see geom_stripe for another place where this is used) > >My geom_stripe? Sorry, I meant geom_slice. >Anyway this will be a big change. No it isn't. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.