From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 9 18:33:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6AEE37B422 for ; Wed, 9 May 2001 18:33:45 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4) id 14xfKl-0002vT-00 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 May 2001 02:33:39 +0100 Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f4A1Xb471672 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 May 2001 02:33:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm) Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 02:33:37 +0100 From: j mckitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: ipfw vs ipfilter Message-ID: <20010510023337.A71628@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From what i have read so far, they seem equivalent, except for grammar. Is there any reason why i would want to use one over the other? I want a solid, fast firewall for a laptop with a dialup connection. thanks, Jonathon -- The beaten path is for the beaten man. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message