From owner-cvs-all Sat Aug 28 14:12:30 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [216.28.46.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF39E14D3C; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 14:12:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DD7EC1C14; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 16:15:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by jade.chc-chimes.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF84C3815; Sat, 28 Aug 1999 16:15:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 28 Aug 1999 16:15:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: "Rodney W. Grimes" Cc: Michael Haro , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/mkdir mkdir.1 mkdir.c In-Reply-To: <199908282102.OAA60244@gndrsh.dnsmgr.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Sat, 28 Aug 1999, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > Log: > > add verbose flag > > Why???? Are you planning to add this to every command. What purpose > does this serve, or what problem does it work around? Do all commits have to work around problems? Are we so stuck in our ways that we can't just add functionality? Though traditionalists and anti-bloat people will have difficulty swallowing these commits, it does help debugging and it does help in scripting. There have been a number of PRs requesting this functionality. Kudos to Michael for actually doing something about it. -- - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message