Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:30:19 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Chris Rees <crees@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Steve Wills <swills@freebsd.org>, perl@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/171084: [PATCH] shells/p5-Shell-Perl: update to 0.0022 Message-ID: <503A794B.6060806@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CADLo838o9B7yrHYJOZeQ-UzLnLf9NAMXWoit36BALW8mLfU%2BBA@mail.gmail.com> References: <201208261840.q7QIe2nV047178@freefall.freebsd.org> <503A6F41.7070205@FreeBSD.org> <503A6FF9.5000207@FreeBSD.org> <503A70A7.30903@FreeBSD.org> <CADLo838o9B7yrHYJOZeQ-UzLnLf9NAMXWoit36BALW8mLfU%2BBA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/26/2012 12:03, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 26 August 2012 19:53, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org> wrote:
>> On 08/26/2012 11:50, Steve Wills wrote:
>>> On 08/26/12 14:47, Doug Barton wrote:
>>>> Steve,
>>>>
>>>> Why do we have this sudden flood of PRs?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'm bored and I got a local portscout instance working, so it's easier
>>> for me to see what's out of date.
>>
>> Ok .... but is there a way for you to relieve your boredom without
>> punishing us? :) Especially if you're going to end up taking the PR
>> anyway?
>
> Not really-- he's getting maintainer approval from a PR.
>
> If you know of any way to send a perl PR without it going via perl, please tell!
The problem seems to be with the gnats auto-assigner:
"^p5-" => "perl",
Can we change that to be a list of ports that perl@ maintains?
The alternative would be to set up a perl-bugs@ list.
Doug
--
I am only one, but I am one. I cannot do everything, but I can do
something. And I will not let what I cannot do interfere with what
I can do.
-- Edward Everett Hale, (1822 - 1909)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?503A794B.6060806>