From owner-freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Mon Sep 14 21:55:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4A6AA04633 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-lists@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A9C2000; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:55:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-lists@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ACF33C46; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:55:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id C1CBA3980E; Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:55:36 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Mike Brown Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, gonzo@freebsd.org Subject: Re: update needed on FreeBSD wiki: BeagleBone Black HDMI support References: <20150914162710.GA68357@chilled.skew.org> Reply-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 17:55:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20150914162710.GA68357@chilled.skew.org> (Mike Brown's message of "Mon, 14 Sep 2015 10:27:10 -0600") Message-ID: <44fv2gd5t3.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2015 21:55:51 -0000 Mike Brown writes: > Someone needs to update https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm/BeagleBoneBlack > to move "HDMI output / framebuffer" from the "What still needs to be done" > section to the "What works" section. Also strike out the first item in the > Known Issues section and add "Fixed in r284534" (or maybe r285868...see the > link below) Done. I used the earlier revision because the later one seems to only be a cosmetic issue. > ...I don't know if it is only in 11-CURRENT or if it has also been > incorporated into 10-STABLE...that would be good to know. It's only in HEAD so far, but that applies to other things on that page as well, so I didn't note it. > Also at the bottom of the page the mention of 10.2-RELEASE needs to be > 10.2-STABLE. I don't know about that, so I left it alone.