Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 9 Nov 2005 21:42:48 -0500
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        John Fox <jjf@mind.net>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Status of 6.0 for production systems
Message-ID:  <20051110024248.GA61785@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net>
References:  <20051110012313.GB22149@mind.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Nov 09, 2005 at 05:23:13PM -0800, John Fox wrote:
> I remember back a while when 5.x had been recently released
> as STABLE and the conventional wisdom said not to use it in
> production until the 5.3 release.
>=20
> Is there any such conventional wisdom as regards 6.x?

FreeBSD 6.0 is the most stable .0 release ever, and more stable than
5.4 in general (although of course you may encounter a bug).

Kris

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFDcrOnWry0BWjoQKURAg0QAKCWOflQFv11AYKzYH84w8gQ3yO2tgCg5NY5
AFLO3H3qKKaEk7TUtYYkykw=
=bPwC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--NzB8fVQJ5HfG6fxh--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051110024248.GA61785>