From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 7 22:57:28 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7412516A401; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [209.31.154.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AA8213C441; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [209.31.154.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F81A4DD9F; Wed, 7 Feb 2007 17:57:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 22:57:26 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: <2107.1170888121@critter.freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20070207225651.T23167@fledge.watson.org> References: <2107.1170888121@critter.freebsd.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, Marcel Moolenaar , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC src/sys/arm/conf EP80219 src/sys/conf NOTES files files.powerpc options src/sys/geom geom_apple.c geom_gpt.c src/sys/geom/part g_part.c g_part.h g_part_apm.c g_part_gpt.c g_part_if.m src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Feb 2007 22:57:28 -0000 On Wed, 7 Feb 2007, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <20070207200130.J23167@fledge.watson.org>, Robert Watson writes: > >>> The ctlreq interface supports verbs to create and destroy >>> partitioning schemes on a disk; to add, delete and modify >>> partitions; and to commit or undo changes made. >> >> Does this mean we can expect to see the disabling of GEOM exclusive-use >> protections disappear from normal administrative activities soon, as there >> will now be approved channels to incrementally change the layout of in-use >> partition tables? > > There is already a mechanism for that. How do you think bsdlabel(8) and > fdisk(8) works ? I understand that. This was a pragmatic question rather than a philosophical question: I know it can be done, but is it now being done. The answer appears to be yes. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge