From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 20 08:56:09 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E1D16A4CE; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:56:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from ray.idi.ntnu.no (ray.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.107.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367B743FB1; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 08:56:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from morten@rodal.no) Received: from hauk10.idi.ntnu.no (hauk10.idi.ntnu.no [129.241.102.222]) by ray.idi.ntnu.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAKGu3DG027537; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:56:04 +0100 (MET) Received: from rodal.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hauk10.idi.ntnu.no (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAKGu3kX085462; Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:56:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from morten@rodal.no) Message-ID: <3FBCF223.7050203@rodal.no> Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:56:03 +0100 From: Morten Rodal User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031026 Thunderbird/0.3 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: John Baldwin References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.81.7.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.7 required=4 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-IDI cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: panic: probing for non-PCI bus X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 16:56:10 -0000 John Baldwin wrote: > acpu_cpu is not the same thing as CPUs listed in the MADT. If > there is no MADT, then FreeBSD won't find any APICs and won't be > able to trust ACPI PCI interrupt routing. In fact, ACPI will still > be trying to route interrupts to the ATPICS, and not to the APICs if > the MADT isn't found and used. > So I *MUST* run without ACPI? (Not that much of a loss, since I'm not using to anything, other than having to push the powerbutton and having the computer safely shut down) Hopefully there isn't many hardware vendors that have such a bogus ACPI implementation. -- Morten Rodal