From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 31 10:50:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E59A16A4CE; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:50:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.broadpark.no (mail.broadpark.no [217.13.4.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9336643D1D; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from dwp.des.no (37.80-203-228.nextgentel.com [80.203.228.37]) by mail.broadpark.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 147AE2C88; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:51:10 +0200 (MEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 79E67B874; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:50:31 +0200 (CEST) To: Maxim Sobolev References: <4133683A.3090201@portaone.com> <4134530C.6020309@portaone.com> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 12:50:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: <4134530C.6020309@portaone.com> (Maxim Sobolev's message of "Tue, 31 Aug 2004 13:29:32 +0300") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: current@freebsd.org cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: burncd(8) usability: why `-s max' isn't default? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:50:35 -0000 Maxim Sobolev writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > > Maxim Sobolev writes: > > > I wonder if there are any compelling reasons why `-s max' is not > > > default behaviour of burncd(8). IMHO, there is no point to have > > > default of 4. Usually, today's drives are smart enough to select the > > > maximum speed supported both by drive and by the medium. > > Plenty of drives aren't, especially with cheap media. > Do you have any evidence? Yes. My laptop's DVD/CD-RW drive (Hitachi something-or-other) turns out coasters if I try to use -s max with no-brand CD-R media. > You will have big problems finding any CD-R media (even very > cheap one) with rating < 32 on the market today, so that chances to > "overspeed" the media with those ancient burners are quite theoretical. What planet do you live on? Back here on Earth, the most widely available CD-R media is 16x or 24x, and prices rise steeply once you cross that boundary. For CD-RW media, that boundary is even lower (8x or 12x). DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no