Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2005 21:59:32 +0000 From: jdyke <jdyke@azimainc.com> To: mcarugno@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: and the winner is... Message-ID: <431779C4.3090509@azimainc.com> In-Reply-To: <2792860b05090114194d4df30a@mail.gmail.com> References: <2792860b05090114194d4df30a@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mario Carugno wrote: > I there, i was trying freebsd for a while, and comparing it against > debian/linux. > The winner was Debian by far... Freebsd could be stable, but it is not > faster... and Debian is far much more 'usable'. > Freebsd package installation is very laborious compared with Debian's apt > system. I have to search in each CD, know dependences,... > X configuration is hard too when the autodetected configuration doesn't > works... > I think fbsd is good, but needs some user facilities. i have never used a cd after a freesbd install?? and debian has an 8 disc download, i found myself changing cds for an hour, only to see X fail on my flat pannel.(sarge) had to configure manually i like apt-get as well, but ports/pkg_* are nearly identical, when it comes to dependency handling, usability why do i have the feeling you chose 'Expert Install' oh, well, enjoy... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?431779C4.3090509>