From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 01:06:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E2516A4BF for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 01:06:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-56339.0x50c6aa0a.abnxx2.customer.tele.dk [80.198.170.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 965A843FDD for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 01:06:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8K869j5049716; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:06:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos@spider.deepcore.dk) Received: (from sos@localhost) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8K8696Y049715; Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:06:09 +0200 (CEST) From: Soren Schmidt Message-Id: <200309200806.h8K8696Y049715@spider.deepcore.dk> In-Reply-To: <20030920001918.G2381@kushnir1.kiev.ua> To: Vladimir Kushnir Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 10:06:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.3 cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: What's happened to CDIOCREADAUDIO & friends? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 08:06:23 -0000 It seems Vladimir Kushnir wrote: > > > > Together with sys/cdio.h, where both ioc_read_audio and CDIOCREADAUDIO are > > > declared > > > > I'll get rid of those... > > > Again, a pity. What benefits do we gain here? Speed? CDDA extraction never > required all that much of it, and to be honest the difference will hardly > be measurable. The only thing it will give is (once again) an interface > completely different from other OSs (== some extra pain for developers == > fewer applications). Excuse me ? AFAIK we are the *only* OS with the CDIOCREADAUDIO interface. I should know since I put the code in the ATAPI driver way back when our device system couldn't handle != %DEV_BSIZE requests. Anyhow, its been ages since it was announced that there is a new and right way to grap audio, that noone hasn't cared about it, well... So stop whining and get the port maintainers to fix the ports that breaks because of this (it would maybe even reduce the diffs :) ). -Søren