From owner-freebsd-security Thu Oct 21 8:56:20 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from s8-37-26.student.washington.edu (S8-37-26.student.washington.edu [128.208.37.26]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8BB14EF5 for ; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 08:56:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcwells@u.washington.edu) Received: from localhost (jcw@localhost) by s8-37-26.student.washington.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA64396; Thu, 21 Oct 1999 20:53:04 GMT (envelope-from jcwells@u.washington.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: s8-37-26.student.washington.edu: jcw owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 21 Oct 1999 20:53:03 +0000 (GMT) From: "Jason C. Wells" X-Sender: jcw@s8-37-26.student.washington.edu Reply-To: "Jason C. Wells" To: Robert Watson Cc: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: krb5 integration Was: Kerberos integration into ports--in particular, SSH In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 21 Oct 1999, Robert Watson wrote: >I suppose the ideal solution is we go to K5 sometime soon and then the >support is built-in? I have been monkeying with krb5 in order to get it to clobber FreeBSD binaries, libs, and includes and hence be "integrated" into the system. I am no programmer but things seem to be working. Also, I am not quite done yet. Is this something you guys would be interested in? Or is my approach too sophomoric for a real development effort? Thank You, | http://students.washington.edu/jcwells Jason Wells | "Those who would trade freedom for security deserve neither | freedom nor security." - Benjamin Franklin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message