From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 3 5:48:56 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4411B37B401 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 05:48:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7971943F9B for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 05:48:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h13DmfhI088284 for ; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from root@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h13DmfR6088283 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from alane) Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 08:48:41 -0500 From: "AlanE [admin]" To: FreeBSD Ports List Subject: lame > lame-devel Message-ID: <20030203134841.GA88265@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Reply-To: alane@geeksrus.net Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Ports List Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-message-flag: Every program expands until it can send mail. Except Exchange Server. Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Does anyone else find it strange that lame-devel is an older, somewhat broken port, when compared to lame? Maybe it should be retired and left to live out its golden years in the Attic. Just a thought... -- AlanE (Alan Eldridge) Unix/C(++) IT Pro for 20 yrs, likes fixing weird distributed systems bugs. KDE, KDE-FreeBSD Teams (http://www.kde.org, http://freebsd.kde.org/) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message