From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 3 10:18:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE77DA84; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5B671638; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 10:18:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.132] (vie-91-186-144-213.dsl.sil.at [91.186.144.213]) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C890A3F449; Tue, 3 Dec 2013 05:18:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2013 11:18:08 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Oliver Lehmann Subject: Re: svn commit: r326685 - in head: devel/mercator math/wfmath In-Reply-To: <20130908173930.Horde.pCVXzy4T-cXp8PC2LonKxg2@avocado.salatschuessel.net> Message-ID: References: <201309072043.r87KhjYi068970@svn.freebsd.org> <20130908033306.GA54749@FreeBSD.org> <20130908115253.Horde.idQUkFxUdsyF3rNQX9eeBA2@avocado.salatschuessel.net> <20130908145110.GB46281@FreeBSD.org> <20130908173930.Horde.pCVXzy4T-cXp8PC2LonKxg2@avocado.salatschuessel.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Alexey Dokuchaev , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:18:18 -0000 On Sun, 8 Sep 2013, Oliver Lehmann wrote: > [USE_GCC] > I looked the differenc between "any" and "yes"t already up after you told me > about "any" the first time by searching bsd.gcc.mk. I still think that it > would be better to have "any" also documented in bsd.gcc.mk at the top. > Maybe in the Examples section - how should anyone know about the two switches > and their meanings? I totally agree, and made that enhancement last month (this was simply missed when USE_GCC=any was added). If you could have a look and advise whether this is now clear, or whether/ what kind of changes to make, that would be great. Thanks, Gerald