From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 26 20:24:17 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CEC3106566B; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:24:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (ZIM.MIT.EDU [18.95.3.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31C88FC14; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:24:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zim.MIT.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2) with ESMTP id pAQKOF2v048731; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:24:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: (from das@localhost) by zim.MIT.EDU (8.14.5/8.14.2/Submit) id pAQKOFA4048730; Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:24:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from das@FreeBSD.ORG) Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 15:24:14 -0500 From: David Schultz To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Message-ID: <20111126202413.GA48676@zim.MIT.EDU> Mail-Followup-To: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , David Chisnall , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org References: <201111261846.pAQIkXZk004285@svn.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG, src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, David Chisnall Subject: Re: svn commit: r228004 - in head: contrib/libcxxrt lib/libcxxrt X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2011 20:24:17 -0000 On Sat, Nov 26, 2011, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote: > On Sat, 26 Nov 2011, David Chisnall wrote: > > >Author: theraven > >Date: Sat Nov 26 18:46:33 2011 > >New Revision: 228004 > >URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/228004 > > > >Log: > > Update libcxxrt to remove the pthread dependency. > > > > Also add the license from upstream to contrib. > > Did the license really come in this format with long lines? It would > be great, given it looks very close to a 2-clause BSD license to make > it as close as we can get to our standard license template. It looks like the license file came from the vendor branch. If it's published by the vendor that way, we shouldn't be introducing gratuitous style differences.