From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 28 11:52:37 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6051C803 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f178.google.com (mail-pd0-f178.google.com [209.85.192.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312AC14C9 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:52:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id y13so260719pdi.23 for ; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:52:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=JJVQcSfHHNgdqV0Gfh3OL+/eecappAZ4flQFwg6d9NM=; b=R2UbmWMLJOKMidpVPI9y6uyu34c+HRTVu4U0AejLJS0LVaN/P1C+AgJl7umOr7NUfK nX0GEFXJvdxfZs+bbrbzBCD9ZGCBFfV5zMsB5MzGAUMDoMxMdgNGCmkRu+jP6eQaMrDL ORqhiOcj+11xCyiNgX+VqFXg3gfTp2Vr4+8uj2S89Ms/3Vy8KZORlhdwGNv6Vp+rffle OqV56GDy0tYy3AhzeEAPKX+sGMl7ouOUG4oqlasWscT7+X3lgkE2e23koSCaovddR13A +Ji2VWA5hZrf5tmJDmGiItHlomDNGFLQFJd+TE3yRPHrmcpeadXTdOCeAIx5hUa0yHqi s/rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk31b0HFyvRwe4KDmEVFzeGAM5JpAs2sXSQRQRe/K7mxLShNr+sonsHMzI7sqMnmVrKVCj2 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.93.132 with SMTP id cu4mr978411pbb.129.1390909956488; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:52:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.176.5 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Jan 2014 03:52:36 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [2001:470:28:12b::3] In-Reply-To: References: <52E7943E.2080908@wasikowski.net> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 12:52:36 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: BHyVe - ESXi comparison From: Andrea Brancatelli To: Matthias Gamsjager Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 11:52:37 -0000 Yes, I tried to emphasized that both at the beginning and at the end of the post... On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:39 PM, Matthias Gamsjager wrote: > And lets not forget the head start vmware has (bhyve is what? 1-2 years > old?) and the size of it. Less then 1mb in code. > > > On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 12:27 PM, =C5=81ukasz W=C4=85sikowski > wrote: > >> W dniu 2014-01-28 12:18, Andrea Brancatelli pisze: >> >> > We did a very rough comparison betweend BHyVe and VMWare ESXi. Maybe y= ou >> > want to give it a read and let me know if I did write a bunch of sh!t >> :-) >> > >> > >> http://andrea.brancatelli.it/2014/01/28/freebsd-10-0-bhyve-vmware-esxi-5= -5-comparison/ >> > >> > I must say I'm very pleased with BHyVe performances! Very good work!! >> > >> > Thanks for your time. >> >> You've wrote: >> >> >> BHyVe took 332 seconds >> VMWare took 313 seconds >> >> The difference is about 106.7%. >> >> I think that the correct conclusion should state: if we assume VMware's >> time as a reference than BHyVe was 6.7% slower (not 106.7%). And it >> should be 6,41% really :) >> >> -- >> best regards, >> Lukasz Wasikowski >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > --=20 *Andrea BrancatelliSchema 31 S.r.l. - Socio UnicoResponsabile ITROMA - FIRENZE - PALERMO ITALYTel: +39. 06.98.358.472* *Cell: +39 331.2488468Fax: +39. 055.71.880.466Societ=C3=A0 del Gruppo SC31 ITALIA*