From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 27 21:01:37 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01E216A41B for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4DCE13C45A for ; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l6RL1EAD028625; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:01:16 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk from=m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk; sender-id=permerror; spf=permerror X-SenderID: Sendmail Sender-ID Filter v0.2.14 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk l6RL1EAD028625 Message-ID: <46AA5D1A.5020207@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:01:14 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070721) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dwinner@dwinner.net References: <46AA4CBB.4080605@dwinner.net> In-Reply-To: <46AA4CBB.4080605@dwinner.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Fri, 27 Jul 2007 22:01:26 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.91.1/3784/Fri Jul 27 18:35:18 2007 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_POLICY_SIGNSOME,DKIM_POLICY_TESTING,DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: "David J. Neu" , "Arend P. van der Veen" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: emacs22 and portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:01:37 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Duane Winner wrote: > We've been having a problem with generating the ports Index ever since > upgrading to emacs22. > > As per /usr/ports/UPDATING, we added EMACS_PORT_NAME=*emacs22* to > /etc/make.conf Errr --- that should probably read: EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs22 You certainly don't need the asterisks there. In any case, setting this variable will screw up indexing, because a number of e-lisp ports will try and append the EMACS_PORT_NAME to their package origin if it is set. However not all the ports that do that also have a slave port 'foo-emacs22' hence the problems with building the INDEX. The best answer is don't set EMACS_PORT_NAME in /etc/make.conf -- emacs22 is the default now anyhow. The INDEX will build just fine, and the various e-lisp packages seem to work OK as well, so long as you've reinstall all the e-lisp packages once you've upgraded from emacs21 to emacs22. Cheers, Matthew - -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGql0a8Mjk52CukIwRCJkgAJ0fh9qkl4eWFQRwrrG8DIwAOqUmlACeMT19 8AWFPYKQdh8Fvko14TCwyxs= =vZLj -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----