Date: Thu, 30 Jun 2016 07:58:58 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 209742] devel/godot: Improve port (v2.0.3) Message-ID: <bug-209742-13-5nIeDge5FJ@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-209742-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-209742-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D209742 --- Comment #36 from lightside <lightside@gmx.com> --- Hello Kubilay Kocak. (In reply to comment #35) > I thought I'd drop in to say great job to you both on collaborating on th= is > issue and using the tracker features very well. Keep it up! :) Thanks :) (In reply to comment #35) > In most cases, its preferred and recommended to separate new port additio= ns > from updates. This is true, but devel/godot-tools depends from devel/godot master port and developed in such a way, that some parts activated in devel/godot port, whi= le other in devel/godot-tools (like EXAMPLES option). Therefore, I think, it's better to use this PR to not lose context. I did the same in bug 198088. (In reply to comment #35) > Poudriere logs are no longer required to be included as attachments. Yes, this was suggested for me by other committer(s) some time ago. I added poudriere log for maintainer's review, because I found it useful, after por= ts changes and because I used them in PR creation process. (In reply to comment #35) > Instead, just write the following in your description/comments after > confirming they PASS Ok, I understood. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-209742-13-5nIeDge5FJ>