From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Apr 10 16:29:30 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7A2A416A4CE; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 228DC43D2D; Sat, 10 Apr 2004 16:29:30 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from eischen@vigrid.com)
Received: from mail.pcnet.com (mail.pcnet.com [204.213.232.4])
	by mail.pcnet.com (8.12.10/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i3ANTTtf000772;
	Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:29:29 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 19:29:29 -0400 (EDT)
From: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com>
X-Sender: eischen@pcnet5.pcnet.com
To: Matthias Schuendehuette <msch@snafu.de>
In-Reply-To: <200404102335.18433.msch@snafu.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10404101927520.238-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
cc: Tim Robbins <tjr@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: libpthread?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 10 Apr 2004 23:29:30 -0000

On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote:

> Hi Dan, Hi you others,
> 
> On Saturday 10 April 2004 17:10, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Sat, 10 Apr 2004, Tim Robbins wrote:
> >
> > You don't need to rebuild any ports if you globally
> > map libc_r to libpthread with /etc/libmap.conf.  Over
> > time, when all your ports are upgraded at your leisure,
> > references to libc_r will be removed.  Of course,
> > portupgrade -af would do the trick much quicker...
> 
> Yeah, that was the key-paragraph! I read this already in UPGRADING but 
> obviously didn't understand it fully...
> 
> 'portupgrade -af' is not an option here because of my ISDN-Line (64 
> kbit/s). I'm perhaps one of the last users of hm's 'i4b'-package... :-)
> 
> > > The golden rule is: don't mix threading libraries within a program.
> > > If a program is linked to libc_r, so must all the other
> > > thread-aware libraries it links to be. The same goes for
> > > libpthread.
> >
> > If you are coming from 5.2.1-RELEASE and before, and trying
> > to upgrade to -release, the default threading library changed
                  ^^^^^^^^
You figured it out, but for anyone else confused, I meant -current.

-- 
Dan Eischen