From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org Wed Dec 30 14:00:15 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9C2D4C44DA for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5Xwv4hm1z3R8v for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F4A54C42C4; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports-bugs@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F13F4C44D9 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D5Xwv42WBz3RFH for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7DB3E1EF6E for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 0BUE0Fwo087438 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 0BUE0F2Z087437 for ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245259] [NEW PORT] multimedia/kodi-addon-game.libretro-devel: Libretro compatibility layer for the Kodi Game API Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: decke@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2020 14:00:15 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245259 Bernhard Froehlich changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |decke@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #2 from Bernhard Froehlich --- I have just chosen this PR to discuss the plans for all the kodi addons that you did send. Is there a specific reason why you created them for the kodi-devel port ins= tead of the kodi port? Are you still interested in the libretro plugins? If we want to get this into the portstree we definitely need to prepare ourselves for the consequences. Right now when the kodi port is updated (mi= nor version change eg. 18.0->18.1) 3 additional addon ports need a version bump= and a pkg-plist change. When the kodi major version changes (eg 18->19) 3 addon ports (and 1-2 additional ports) need a full update at the same time. That doesn't scale well if we add another 10 addon ports. The result would be that hardly any committers would take that PRs. It's a = lot of work to get all maintainers coordinated and to commit all this stuff together. As you already know the manpower for maintaining the kodi ports is also qui= te low on our side and we are duplicating a lot of work because we have kodi a= nd kodi-devel in the tree which are similar but different and each with their = own set of addons which is just nonsense. I am not sure yet how to solve this properly but in my opinion we should definitely focus on one kodi port and cleanup that kodi-addon mess before we add more to it. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=