From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 11 15:47:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gidgate.gid.co.uk [193.123.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C05E162DB for ; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 15:41:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.8.8/8.8.7) id NAA05733 for hackers@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Apr 1999 13:26:24 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb) Date: Sun, 11 Apr 1999 13:26:24 +0100 (BST) From: Bob Bishop Message-Id: <199904111226.NAA05733@gidgate.gid.co.uk> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: arp weirdness Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I've just upgraded a pair of servers which each have more than one netcard and sit on multiple networks, with aliases. The catch is that two of the networks are on the same physical cable. Eg: ed1: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.31.26.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.31.26.255 inet 192.31.26.2 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 192.31.26.2 ether 00:00:c0:6d:1a:bc ed2: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 193.123.140.10 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 193.123.140.255 inet 193.123.140.99 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 193.123.140.99 ether 00:40:95:15:42:7d I'm getting lots of messages like the following (edited for readability): /kernel: arp: 192.31.26.12 is on ed1 but got reply from 00:20:18:2c:26:6f on ed2 Anything I can do about this (apart from cabling or a kernel hack!)? TIA To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message