Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 05 Jan 2004 20:16:39 -0600
From:      Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>
To:        Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: RFC: Restructuring GNOME meta-ports
Message-ID:  <opr1b0l1f28ckrg5@smtp.central.cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040106015049.GM27144@toxic.magnesium.net>
References:  <1073346203.765.210.camel@gyros> <20040106015049.GM27144@toxic.magnesium.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004 20:50:49 -0500, Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> 
wrote:

>>> (01.05.2004 @ 1843 PST): Joe Marcus Clarke said, in 1.9K: <<
>> I was thinking maybe we should borrow something from garnome seeing as
>> since they've borrowed practically everything from us already ;-) (the
>> ports system, that is).  What if we restructured the GNOME meta-ports to
>> look something like this:
>>
>> x11/gnome2 (leave it the way it is)
>> x11/gnome2-lite (leave it the way it is)
>
> I would rather see an x11/gnome2-desktop port, and have x11/gnome2 be a
> metaport for the Whole Damn Thing. Or, well... I think there should be a
> meta meta port.

Or, opposite? x11/gnome2-desktop have the Whole Damn Thing. I think, 
x11/gnome2 should be stick to what www.gnome.org has.

> Also, I think that gnome2-lite could also perhaps be made to be a meta
> meta port.
>
>> x11/gnome2-fifth-toe (Will consist of the following):
>>  graphics/gthumb2 news/pan2 net/gnomeicu2
>>  x11-toolkits/gnome-themes-extras sysutils/gkrellm
>>  graphics/gimp-devel www/bluefish-devel
>>  net/tsclient graphics/sodipodi

graphics/inkscape is doing a lot better than graphics/sodipodi now, so 
should be either add or replace imo.

> I'd like to see maybe an entertainment category. Totem, rhythmbox,
> xchat2, gossip, gnomeicu2, etc. Maybe a systemtools category that
> contains gftp, gnomenetwork, etc. Dunno where all of this leaves gkrellm
> and gdesklets, but I think that they should be in the same category.
> Besides, gdesklets seems to be becoming more popular than gkrellm2,
> development of which seems to have slowed to a halt.

I couldn't see how gkrellm can be part of Gnome, so I am disagree for 
gkrellm to be part of Gnome's meta port.

Anyway, it won't be easy to make that kind of decision...too many apps.. 
:-)

Cheers,
Mezz

> # Adam
>
>
> --
> Adam Weinberger
> vectors.cx	>>  adam@vectors.cx	>>  http://www.vectors.cx
> magnesium.net	<<  adamw@magnesium.net	<<  http://www.magnesium.net/~adamw
> FreeBSD		>>  adamw@FreeBSD.org	>>  http://people.freebsd.org/~adamw
> #vim:set ts=8: 8-char tabs prevent tooth decay.


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?opr1b0l1f28ckrg5>