From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 19:19:28 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 323D51065673 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: from smtp1.tls.net (smtp1.tls.net [65.124.104.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02458FC22 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:19:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave.list@pixelhammer.com) Received: (qmail 29772 invoked from network); 17 Dec 2008 19:19:23 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.2.3 ppid: 29759, pid: 29769, t: 0.1503s scanners: attach: 1.2.3 spam: 3.2.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on smtp1.tls.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,TVD_RCVD_IP autolearn=disabled version=3.2.1 Received: from 64-184-11-100.bb.hrtc.net (HELO ?192.168.1.46?) (ldg@tls.net@64.184.11.100) by ssl-smtp1.tls.net with ESMTPA; 17 Dec 2008 19:19:23 -0000 Message-ID: <494950B1.3090305@pixelhammer.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:19:13 -0500 From: DAve User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <26face530812170701n4160dba2ve183d8860b6d4a69@mail.gmail.com> <49491705.5060108@pixelhammer.com> <20081217190708.P2011@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> In-Reply-To: <20081217190708.P2011@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Publishing information via DNS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2008 19:19:28 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> Someone needs to invent and promote a >> TextualDatagramPublicationProtocol or TDPP because DNS has been abused >> for publishing non DNS data for too long. Continuing to use DNS for >> things it was never intended to do will only cloud the issue and delay >> implementation when the internet decides to take DNS security seriously. >> > where do you see security issue of that? except that someone voluntarily > publish his/her private data this way - but it won't be DNS security > problem but his/her problem > > I can see the DNS system changing in order to provide needed security, and the process/protocol being delayed or muddied because of possible interference with SpamAssassin channel publication, or ClamAV update publication, or SPF, or whatever is next chosen to piggy back onto DNS. DNS is the lifeblood of the internet, without it nothing works. DNS should not be the open pipe everyone throws their excess baggage into. Just my thoughts. I won't argue the point with those who want to use DNS text records for broadcasting when their Flicker account has new puppy pictures. DAve -- The whole internet thing is sucking the life out of me, there ain't no pony in there.