From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue May 25 16:38:20 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC6714CA7
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 25 May 1999 16:38:14 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.1) id BAA96367;
	Wed, 26 May 1999 01:38:07 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from des)
To: "Morten Seeberg" <morten@seeberg.dk>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Error in 3.2-RELEASE GENERIC
References: <012501bea6e4$0ac3a1e0$9c0d010a@tp.swamp.dk>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>
Date: 26 May 1999 01:38:06 +0200
In-Reply-To: "Morten Seeberg"'s message of "Tue, 25 May 1999 21:23:17 +0200"
Message-ID: <xzphfp0lnz5.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Morten Seeberg" <morten@seeberg.dk> writes:
> GENERIC says:
> device   apm0  at isa? disable flags 0x31
> [...]
> The flag is wrong(?), and the disable/enable command causes config to fail
> this line.

The flags are correct. Read LINT. The 'disable' is there because we
don't normally want apm, but we want laptop users to be able to enable
it without recompiling their kernel.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message