From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 28 15:30:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8121065672 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:30:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB8308FC12 for ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.topspin.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA06965; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:30:43 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@icyb.net.ua) Received: from localhost.topspin.kiev.ua ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.topspin.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1OpNMg-0007eV-OZ; Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:30:42 +0300 Message-ID: <4C792BA1.7070107@icyb.net.ua> Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 18:30:41 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100822 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com References: <201008272110.o7RLA3tQ075370@freefall.freebsd.org> <20100828120748.7ae409e0@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4C78E66A.7090503@icyb.net.ua> <20100828140857.08b8ede6@ernst.jennejohn.org> <19577.7654.501424.2323@gossamer.timing.com> <20100828171524.5d448da6@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100828171524.5d448da6@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/148712: [UPDATE] x11-drivers/xf86-video-ati to v6.13.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 15:30:46 -0000 on 28/08/2010 18:15 Gary Jennejohn said the following: > IMO all this doesn't change the fact that there's a bug in r6xx_accel.c - > it uses a variable which is declared inside of an #ifdef outside of the > #ifdef. True. The fact that it slipped to the release shows quality of their testing and the fact that the developers and all Linux distros use the same typical configuration. -- Andriy Gapon