Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2016 09:13:34 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <royger@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Lists <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>, Colin Percival <cperciva@tarsnap.com>, Alexander Motin <mav@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: number of xen block devices Message-ID: <CAHu1Y70uCjZH92iMe4NVaK3q9%2BbSfFb0DpT%2B7OtBCNoXOY-Pag@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3132e8d0-68db-940f-5cb1-22fe01b52480@freebsd.org> References: <73fad119-03d8-a9ea-c222-f65b22c6feac@freebsd.org> <010001574a0207f9-d12e326c-e152-49f9-9763-2cf0161f7458-000000@email.amazonses.com> <3132e8d0-68db-940f-5cb1-22fe01b52480@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Also check if there is a resource limit imposed by AWS. If you are bumping into that, a simple request can get the limit raised for a particular availability zone. On Sep 20, 2016 16:55, "Julian Elischer" <julian@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 20/09/2016 4:50 PM, Colin Percival wrote: > >> On 09/20/16 16:33, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >>> Is there a maximum number of block devices supported for an AMI type >>> installation? >>> >> Does "AMI type installation" mean EC2? >> > yes > >> >> Our tests a while back showed a limit of 14. >>> >>> Has that changed in 10.3? >>> >>> If not is it an artificial limit we can get past by simply recompiling >>> something? >>> >> There was a bug a while back which resulted in high-numbered xbd >> devices not showing up; I fixed that three years ago in r255051, >> shortly before stable/10 branched. >> > that may be what we were seeing. > I'll know in a few days. > > >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAHu1Y70uCjZH92iMe4NVaK3q9%2BbSfFb0DpT%2B7OtBCNoXOY-Pag>