From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 13:16:34 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8D911065672 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (kontrol.kode5.net [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA078FC1A for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kontrol.kode5.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q7KDGWSJ029250 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:16:33 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by kontrol.kode5.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q7KDGWYI029249 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:16:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@kode5.net) X-Authentication-Warning: kontrol.kode5.net: jamie set sender to jamie@kode5.net using -f Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 14:16:32 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20120820131632.GB6963@kontrol.kode5.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20120820081117.7039e739@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120820081117.7039e739@scorpio> x-operating-system: FreeBSD 9.1-PRERELEASE amd64 x-pgp-fingerprint: A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: Issue with kernel building X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 13:16:35 -0000 == Jerry wrote on Mon 20.Aug'12 at 8:11:17 -0400 == > I inquired several years ago about the possibility of changing the > renaming format into something like: "kernel_##_YY-MM-DD.old". The "##" > would be incremented with each successive build on a given day. I > thought it would alleviate just the sort of problem you are referring > to and would make it easier to revert to a specific kernel if required. > I never received even a single response so I guess it was not a well > received concept. I think it's a valid and idiot-proof suggestion; however, the handbook information regarding building custom kernels is pretty clear. The steps are not difficult to understand if you ask me.