From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 30 22:53:41 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DDA16A41C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 22:53:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B45643D4C for ; Mon, 30 May 2005 22:53:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 38478523F0; Mon, 30 May 2005 15:53:40 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 15:53:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Sebastian Ahndorf Message-ID: <20050530225340.GA34233@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20050529221024.4fu2p4yjusk04k0g@mail.banot.net> <20050529212705.GA64753@xor.obsecurity.org> <1117447400.5384.4.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050530104928.GB79877@sr.se> <1117465224.9934.7.camel@localhost.localdomain> <429B44BD.7070806@pp.nic.fi> <20050530191843.GA82875@xor.obsecurity.org> <429B7DF6.8040704@it-is-warlock.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <429B7DF6.8040704@it-is-warlock.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Imobach ??? Sosa , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Poor network performance: a lot of timeouts X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 22:53:41 -0000 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 10:56:22PM +0200, Sebastian Ahndorf wrote: > Kris Kennaway wrote: > >>Both sides must have same config, autosense should work if there is no= =20 > >>config possibility in other end. > > > > > >autosense may in fact not work, especially on low-quality NICs like rl. > > >=20 > I don't agree to that. > I had similar problems with my network using a cheap switch with some=20 > realtek nics. I had the nics running 100baseTX Full Duplex. > Changing this to autosense made the problems gone. Your one example does not disprove the statement. I've seen this problem myself, and so have many others. Kris --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCm5lzWry0BWjoQKURAq+GAKCVkovPoSPq/L13mV2uSklmECMPgACg6Nzf tiASRGMAINcB5jO6oWFysv4= =bALp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--