From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 17 20:24:35 2009
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 622CE106568C
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:24:35 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr)
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F125E8FC71
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:24:34 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (heho.snv.jussieu.fr [134.157.184.22])
	by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.3/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id n7HKOYl4046461
	; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:24:34 +0200 (CEST)
X-Ids: 164
Received: from heho.snv.jussieu.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n7HKOXsB004265;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:24:33 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr)
Received: (from arno@localhost)
	by heho.snv.jussieu.fr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n7HKOX1T004262;
	Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:24:33 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from arno)
To: Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net>
From: "Arno J. Klaassen" <arno@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>
References: <F61821DF-7187-4C00-A691-0E4D88E83D4F@mac.com>
	<wpbpmea1xf.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr> <4A897ACE.8020405@haruhiism.net>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:24:32 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4A897ACE.8020405@haruhiism.net> (Kamigishi Rei's message of
	"Mon\, 17 Aug 2009 19\:44\:14 +0400")
Message-ID: <wpiqgmxk73.fsf@heho.snv.jussieu.fr>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.94.2/9705/Mon Aug 17 19:03:09 2009 on
	shiva.jussieu.fr
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Cc: Marcel Moolenaar <xcllnt@mac.com>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rc(8) regression. What's the story?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 20:24:35 -0000

Kamigishi Rei <spambox@haruhiism.net> writes:

> Arno J. Klaassen wrote:
>> However, if I place kldload if_bge in rc.local (and normal multi-user
>> boot) :
>>   
> I'm pretty sure that rc.local is executed after netif.
> Which means that when netif parses ifconfig_bge0, that interface is
> not even present in the system.

my main point is that 'ping' and 'resolv' do not function when
ifconfig_bge0 is started by netif and if_bge loaded at boot, nor in
multi-user neither in single-user and executing netif by hand and then
go multi-user

I ignore how netif or some other mechanism can pick up ifconfig_bge0
when if_bge is kldloaded in rc.local, I can just confirm that when I
leave it out rc.local my ifconfig list only contains lo0

tested with network_interfaces="auto"

Arno